While the main findings should be summarized in the discussion, the results including statistics and main figures should be presented only in the results section.
Our data, however, put additional constraints on this connectivity model. When using standard lab or field methods and instrumentation, it is not always necessary to explain the procedures e. While the inclusion of few patients prohibits the extrapolation of our findings to the general population, disease X is extremely rare, and this study presents data from the largest number of subjects to date.
These findings are consistent with the random connectivity model provided that there is at least one component of the overall connectivity that is strong, sparse and decreases fast with distance.
This is your opportunity to thank anyone who helped you with your science fair project, from a single individual to a company or government agency. Explain how your results relate to expectations and to literature cited in your Introduction.
Different experimental procedures, including direct mappings of synaptic connectivity in local cortical circuits, would be required to reveal the underlying organizational principles of the auditory cortex.
When a discussion is too long, the reader often loses sight of the main message of the study. Use the past tense. The description of findings [results] and the interpretation of their significance [discussion] should be distinct sections of your paper.
It is characterized by single actions per sentence and lots of unnecessary details. Give a brief explanation about why you believe the findings and conclusions of your study are important and how they support broader knowledge or understanding of the research problem.
Restating the results By far the most common error made in the discussion is restating the results. Gather up the information for each section and type it in a word processor if you haven't already. Describe the procedures for your study in sufficient detail that other scientists could repeat your work to verify your findings.
With this in mind, be careful that you do not read more into the findings than can be supported by the evidence you have gathered. Should you need to remind the reader of a finding to be discussed, use "bridge sentences" that relate the result to the interpretation. Although this concern has not been thoroughly ruled out, it seems unlikely because, in at least one study, GABAergic interneuorns were loaded just as efficiently as neighboring pyramidal neurons using similar methodology A Sociology Writer's Guide.
This section describes an organizational structure commonly used to report experimental research in many scientific disciplines, the IMRAD format: I Cite References in Your Paper; Writing Center Home; Discussion Section.
The table below offers some questions effective discussion sections in scientific reports address. What do your.
Formatting Science Reports. This section describes an organizational structure commonly used to report experimental research in many scientific disciplines, the IMRAD format: Introduction, Methods, Results, And Discussion.
Although the main headings are standard for many scientific fields, details may vary; check with your instructor, or, if submitting an article to a journal, refer to the. How to Write an Effective Discussion Dean R Hess PhD RRT FAARC Introduction Elements to Include in the Discussion “Anatomy of a Research Paper: Science Writing ,” at the 48th International Respiratory Congress, held October 5–8,in Tampa, Florida.
Key Info. At this point, you are in the home stretch. Except for writing the abstract, preparing your science fair project final report will just entail pulling together the information you have already collected into one large document.
Your final report will include these sections: Title page. Abstract. The content of the discussion section of your paper most often includes: When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations for the study results, rather than just those that fit your hypothesis or prior assumptions and biases.
you must be clear in how you report the information discovered and. How to Write an Effective Discussion Dean R Hess PhD RRT FAARC Introduction Always write the discussion for the reader; remember that the focus should be to help the “Anatomy of a Research Paper: Science Writing ,” at the 48th International Respiratory Congress, held October 5–8,in .Writing a science report discussion paper